Diary of a Bad Year is apparently being classified as “radical literary theory”, and theory is not fiction; therefore, Coetzee’s novel failed to make the Booker longlist. This highlights the question of border-blur in the classification of books. Where is the line drawn on radical, and how fine is the distinction between the theorist and novelist prose style?
If you had a Wordsy account you could comment on this story. Get an account now!
hmm, I guess it diddnt fit in that box.